If you’ve ever wondered how people of a different ethnicity are treated, it’s sometimes difficult to walk a mile in their shoes. After all, we can’t all be like Robert Downey Jr.’s character Kirk Lazarus in Tropic Thunder, nonchalantly donning an elaborate new racial identity as one would a new coat. The only viable resource we have as ordinary citizens is the Internet. Online, we can assume any identity we want, presenting ourselves as members of a different race through our habits, our words, and through the information we choose to distribute about ourselves.
I stumbled across a recent blog post concerned with whether racial identity is a product of ourselves or those around us. My first thought was that this idea misses the point. Our identities do not define how we act—our actions define our identities. This is an important point to consider, especially regarding online identities, because in order to “pass” for another race, we have to avoid falling into stereotypes that may or may not have any basis in truth.
In her book Cybertypes: Race, Ethnicity, and Identity on the Internet, Lisa Nakamura examines the impact that telecommunications technologies like the Internet can have on identity. She writes:
“While telecommunications and medical technologies can challenge some gender and racial stereotypes, they can produce and reflect them as well.” (Nakamura 4)So not only does the Internet allow us to challenge stereotypes by providing a medium in which to express ourselves, it also reflects the stereotypes we already have by allowing us to perform the kind of actions we think those of another race would perform. But there is a downside to this kind of freedom. Nakamura notes that:
“Rather than ‘honouring diversity’…performances online used race and gender as amusing prostheses to be donned and shed without ‘real life’ consequences.” (Nakamura 13-14)Racial passing online can be seen as a kind of social experiment that we can try on our own, when we feel like it, without affecting our day-to-day lives. The anonymity of the Internet ensures that any slip-ups or embarrassments cannot be attributed to us, making it easier and more appealing for ‘identity tourists’ to poke a toe into the swimming pool of another racial identity without having to jump right in. But Nakamura also points out that such glimpses into the lives of others may not be valuable as learning experiences since those who pass are unlikely to experience any quantifiable discrimination, leading to a potentially false impression that minority groups may not have it all that bad.
For these minority groups, passing may be an escape. Another aspect of racial passing has to do with a feeling of deep-seated inequity, a feeling that the grass is always greener on the other side of the fence.
But is passing really necessary on the part of these minority groups? After all, when we think of the stereotypical computer-user, we usually think of the geeky, socially awkward computer nerd. The white boy with copious amounts of facial hair, glasses, and pasty skin. As Nakamura notes, our ability to choose our own online identities is often an illusion, because:“…passing is often driven by harsh structural cultural inequities, a sense that it really would be safer, more powerful, and better to be of another race and gender.” (Nakamura 31)
“…in the absence of racial description, all players are assumed to be white.” (Nakamura 38)Maybe that blog post I mentioned earlier is right. Maybe racial identity is more of a product of those around us. It’s a rather bleak thought, isn’t it?
That all players are assumed to be white is true. And if any word hints at another race, they are assumed to be of that race. Somebody who plays games under the alias of "El Diablo" for example, might be considered Latino, although that sort of name is popular amongst many groups. I saw somebody online who's account was called "For.Allah". When asked if he was Arabic, he replied that no he wasn't. If he hadn't been asked, most people would have assumed that he was.
ReplyDeleteI agree that it must be an interesting experience, racial passing. I've seen quite a bit of racism towards somebody because they were assumed to be of a certain race (from some queue in their name, I'm sure), when in fact they were not. The assumptions and reactions of some people are interesting.
I wonder if pretending to be in a different age group counts as passing too?
I'm glad you brought up the topic of online games. I'm going to be addressing that in a later post, but I thought I'd give a few quick remarks. First, you're on to something with your "For.Allah" example. Some of the most publicized examples of racial passing tend to be the "samurai warrior" or the "geisha girl"--even when the majority of those with screen names or avatars denoting this identity are actually white. Oftentimes these people are not only participating in racial passing, but gender passing as well.
ReplyDeleteAs for "age passing" I think that's a definite possibility. Passing in general can mean pretending to be something you're not, whether it be of a different race, gender, sexual orientation, age, religious denomination, political affiliation etc. I'm pretty sure that some sites have age limits (of the 18+ variety) which anyone can claim to be on the Internet. Ain't anonymity grand?